poyglass.blogg.se - Apple server os x

#Apple server os x for mac#
#Apple server os x full#
#Apple server os x pro#
#Apple server os x software#

This is still a very new development, and honestly something I really don't understand where Apple is heading with.įirst, I have to admit that I don't yet really use MacOS iCal server, and also have very limited experience with any other groupware solution, both as user and admin. To add an answer about the groupware functionality asked in the comment by Marie: A boss who just wants to add a few Macs to the network for no other reason that to be hip and have a Mac, without thinking about the consequences is the same kind of idiot than the admin who shuns everything Apple because "Apple is for fanboys only", without knowing anything about the platform. I currently experience this while planning a SAN.Īll in all, I can only recommend to really learn what the different architectures offer and what your requirements are and make a decision based on that.

Often, software/hardware packages are not certified for MacOS, leaving you without support if needed.

Integrating MacOS Server into a larger environment can sometimes be quite difficult.

If you know your way around Linux, have more Win/Linux than Mac clients and can live with some restrictions on the Mac side, a Linux server might indeed be cheaper.

This might require working around some issues (not storing the password in the LDAP database being a prime example).

#Apple server os x software#

Also, while Apple used many standard open source software packages to create the system, they often decided to do things a little bit differently than others, sometimes for no apparent reason.

First, while certainly possible, it is not really cut out to scale to the enterprise, and doing so will require intimate knowledge of the system.

That said, MacOS Server has some drawbacks, of course.

While this is not the subject of the question, even being more expensive than Windows clients for the initial purchase, Macs have a much lower TCO in many environments, if users would stop thinking in brands and reputations and instead start to learn what the real differences and pros/cons are, beyond the logo and the more or less fancy GUIs.

#Apple server os x pro#

Even if you plan to run a Win clients only or mixed Win/Mac environment with a Linux server and Samba in a 10 to 20 user environment without a pro admin, I would recommend using MacoS Server in many cases, as it shields all those implicit complexities behind an really easy to use GUI.At least with simple requirements, the promise of not needing a pro admin is much more realistic for a Mac only shop than for any other platform. Scaling out is another thing, but this requires detailed knowledge on any platform. In my experience, general administration is much more easy than on any Linux system and also than on Windows, at least for smallish groups.Telling your users you don't support these might be possible, but it also might break some applications.

#Apple server os x full#

Naturally, it also has full support for all the small Mac client specifics like resource forks, finder attributes and stuff like that which all have the potential to become a real PITA if you use a Win or Linux server instead.

#Apple server os x for mac#

It allows for an extremely easy creation of features comparable to Win group policies for Mac clients, much more easy then to do the same for Win clients on a Windows server.

MacOS Server offers major advantages if you use Mac clients in you network.

I was about to write an endless essay about the pro's and con's, but let's make it short instead.

With no real Mac Server hardware and the Server software being just a cheap add-on to the client OS X with dramatically limited usability and functionality, newer OS X server versions (10.7+) can't be reasonably used beyond small workgroups, preferentially in Mac-only shops.

Edit, as this post still gathers the occasional vote: All of the points below are now irrelevant.